For its recent in-house conference, ACLA must have thought it made sense to get an American to explain how the ripples of a US-originated crisis made it all the way across the Pacific. As Christopher Kell, partner with Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in Sydney, turned slide after slide, explaining the system of mortgage-backed financial products, it became clear how this niche market could shake the global financial system.
As a corporate and structured finance specialist, Kell is the right man to explain the crisis, but to do this in under half an hour is, even for him, a feat that he wouldn’t want to repeat everyday. He compares it to trying to see the Louvre in Paris from top to bottom in just 6.5 minutes; you can do it, but you have to wear tennis shoes.
Kell finds less difficulty in explaining the impact of the credit crunch on Skadden’s Sydney office. He says the securitisation practice is the only practice in the firm that has been directly affected by the lack of liquidity in the market. He says the practice had a growing number of clients before the credit crunch hit the financial markets.
“Starting about nine months ago, this market has shut down, that is clearly the case,” he says. “But as for the rest of the market, we have seen a constant stream of equity and debt transactions and M&A deals. I think that is because the Asia Pacific market has not been hit nearly as badly by the access to capital as Europe and the US has been hit.”
Waldo Jones, partner with
Sullivan & Cromwell in Sydney, agrees that there is still work in advising on US aspects of Australian M&A transactions, but says many deals have been shelved resulting in fewer closures. “This year has probably been one of the more difficult years in recent memory, as a result of the market turmoil caused by the credit crisis. While we have been kept busy this year, I don’t want to underplay the number of deals that have been shelved or sidelined because law firms ultimately rise and fall with completed deals by their clients.”
Wall Street firms
Although one would expect the law firms that practice solely US law in Australia to have been hit hard by the crisis and subsequent economic downturn back home, they all report only a minor impact on their practice. “In terms of the work that we do down here, that has all been extraordinarily strong,” says Bob Meyers, partner with
Sidley Austin in Sydney. “It has not been materially impacted at all.”
Sidley opened an office in Sydney last year, when it took over
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman’s operations. Meyers says his team finds most of their work in capital markets and corporate finance transactions and haven’t undertaken any securitisation work, although Sidley has been working for Australian clients on securitisation deals from its US and UK offices.
Australia hosts offices from five US law firms if we include
Baker & McKenzie, which arguably is only American in name since more than 80% of its lawyers practice outside the US. The fifth is
Jones Day, which practises both US and Australian law. Chris Ahern, partner with the firm in Sydney, explains that the firms that have been hit the hardest by the credit crunch are the so-called ‘Wall Street’ firms.
“
There are some US firms that had significant work in securitisations and collateralised debt obligations. Jones Day, for better or worse, is not a leader in the financial product, Wall Street-based work. We’re often acting for the companies that are raising the debts, while the banks are represented by the Wall Street firms.”
He goes as far as to say that the credit crunch had a positive effect on Jones Day’s business. “We actually had an increase in M&A activity, because [the crisis] meant that a lot of our clients could go back to doing deals at reasonable values, without private equity firms bidding them out of the process.”
“I think that the transactions where private equity firms leverage off the balance sheet and say ‘let’s make a supernormal return in a three to five year cycle’ to which extent it was ever successful in Australia.”
|
US FIRMS IN AUSTRALIA
· Baker & McKenzie – 80 partners, 180 lawyers in Sydney and Melbourne;
Australian law and US law
· Jones Day – 4 partners, 9 lawyers in Sydney; Australian and US law
|
|
WHY AUSTRALIA?
Sullivan & Cromwell decided to make the move down under in the 1980s, when Australian resources companies started to look beyond their own borders and raise capital in the US. Jeffrey Browne, who continues to act as of-counsel to the firm, founded the Sullivan and Cromwell’s Melbourne office 25 years ago. At that time, the firm was the first in Australia to practice solely US law. When ALB asked whether it was still relevant to have a presence on the ground in Australia the answer was a somewhat surprised ‘of course!’.
“We are involved in many transactions in Australia. We wouldn’t be able to do that to the same extent without offices here,” says John Estes, partner at Sullivan & Cromwell in Melbourne. “For instance, if you look at offshore capital raising activities by Australian issuers, a significant amount of the preparatory work is undertaken by lawyers here in Australia.”
Bob Meyers, partner at Sidley Austin in Sydney, agrees: “There is still a lot of high-quality work – capital markets and other corporate finance work – that gets done here,” he says. “Australia is a major centre in the financial services sector, including the investment banking community. Besides, many of our Australian clients are very active in the US, in the UK and in Asia Pacific, where we have a significant presence.”
Chris Kell, partner at Skadden in Sydney, says it’s not just practicalities such as time zones that keep them here, but an on-the-ground presence also gives you a feel for the market, he says. “There are a lot of differences between the [US and Australian] markets, which are not that well-known. The similarities amass some very profound cultural differences. You can make a lot of errors not being sensitive to those differences.”
The relevance of an Australian presence is underlined by the interest of new entrants to the market. At the time of writing, Minneapolis-based Dorsey & Whitney displayed an interest in opening an office in Sydney, which would be led by London capital markets partner John Chrisman. Chrisman currently heads up Dorsey’s India and Australia practices and intends to practice US law only.
None of the American firms that practice only US law in Australia have any intention to expand their activities to include Australian law, but some are tempted by geographical expansion. “Perth is an interesting city,” says John Estes. “We work on various projects in the resources sector and are increasingly advising Perth-based clients in this and other sectors. Now, I don’t think we’re looking at opening an office there, but it is something that we need to continuously monitor.”
|
